Agree the question before collecting documents
Write the problem in one sentence: orders are late, growth is consuming cash, or every decision needs the owner. Add the decisions you hope to make after the review. A request to “look at everything” needs boundaries, otherwise document collection can become the project.
Confirm the period, locations and functions in scope. Ask who will see the records, how they will be transferred, and when copies will be deleted. Share only what the agreed work needs; redact personal details where they are irrelevant.
- Purpose and scope of the review
- A named internal coordinator
- People available for interviews
- Expected outputs and a date to discuss findings
Bring records that can be traced back to their source
Start with the last few reporting periods and include a comparable seasonal period if demand fluctuates. Bring the reports your managers already use, together with an explanation of how each number is produced. An estimate can be useful when it is clearly labelled.
For financial records, ask your accountant to explain inconsistencies rather than silently correcting the presentation. The reviewer needs to distinguish a reporting problem from an operating problem.
- Sales and management accounts, with the reporting period identified
- Outstanding invoices, supplier commitments and stock summaries where relevant
- Order, delivery, complaint and rework records
- Organisation chart, role responsibilities and existing process documents
Choose examples of normal work and exceptions
Select a recently completed order, one delayed order and one that needed correction. Trace the messages, approvals and handoffs for each. Remove customer identifiers that are not needed. This helps the reviewer see the difference between a written procedure and daily work.
Do not select only your strongest branch or most experienced employee. Include the people who receive incomplete information and the people who have to repair mistakes. Let them describe the process without having to defend it.
Make missing information visible
Keep a simple list of each requested item, its owner, whether it exists and the date it can be supplied. If a measure has never been recorded, say so. Reconstructing months of invented precision makes the audit less reliable.
Ask the reviewer which gaps genuinely block a decision. Some can be addressed with a small sample or observation; others may require a separate data-cleaning exercise. Agree that distinction before paying for extra work.
Prepare for the decisions after the review
Book a findings discussion while the relevant managers are available. Ask for evidence behind each finding, its likely operational effect and the first action proposed. Distinguish verified observations from hypotheses that still need testing.
Before closing, assign an owner to each agreed priority and choose a review date. You do not need to accept every recommendation immediately. Ask what can wait, what depends on another action, and what would make the recommendation change.
Start with one problem statement, your current reports and three examples of work. An honest gap list is more valuable than a perfect-looking folder.
